Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	0.4 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '22 at 00:56
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5675 22 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Memory 72.2 1-Core 77.4 2-Core 153 59% 101 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 450 44% 362 Pts	64-Core 491 30% 491 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 107GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 369 253 268 108 154 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 77%
Qemu HARDDISK 322GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 288GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 160 163 234 264 217 MB/s Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24% Poor	Read 250 Write 155 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 205 38% 173 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.1 6% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x1GB 247 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 1 slots used 1GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	36.6% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.8 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 7.5 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 96.4 42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 116%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $499

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16