Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121211
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '22 at 18:31
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1607 0 2,020 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 83 1-Core 78.1 2-Core 141 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 301 41% 303 Pts	64-Core 302 19% 302 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	5.96% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 9.6 Parallax 6.6 6% 7.73 fps	MRender 9.2 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 7 6% 8.03 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.96% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB 14,802 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.Y SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 165 77 125 87 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	49% Average	Read 209 Write 368 Mixed 241 SusWrite 131 54% 237 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 49.1 4K Mixed 28.5 95% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 28 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 38 37% 56.6 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A 8x4GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	88% Excellent	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 37.8 MC Mixed 32.9 99% 34.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 12.1 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	23x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	3x

SSD
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	3x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	3x
Vector 256GBOCZ $240Bench 93%, 2,095 samples	2x

RAM
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	3x
M391B5273DH0- 8x4GBSamsungBench 83%, 37 samples	3x
M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A M378B5173QH0- M378B5173QH0- 44GBSamsungBench 82%, 5 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16