Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_A509JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_A509JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509JA
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 18:25
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 169
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 453
45% 369 Pts
64-Core 475
29% 475 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1EC1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.05% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 8.8
6% 8.17 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 0.3
5% 7.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.05%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 512GB
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 912 732 740 741 739 739 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,080
Write 1,293
Mixed 1,152
SusWrite 767
242% 1,073 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 67.7
235% 89 MB/s
DQ Read 904
DQ Write 722
DQ Mixed 816
610% 814 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 199%
Great: 203%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
28GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 35.1
Write 16.2
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 18.6
29% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.8
148% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 35%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
12GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.8 4.7 4.1 4.4 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 7.2
Mixed 5
SusWrite 3.9
9% 7.65 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.8
66% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.7% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 21
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 21.3
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_A509JA Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_A509JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback