Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 16:26
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$59
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 133
2-Core 265
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 524
69% 516 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.3% Above average
Lighting 71.5
Reflection 70
Parallax 105
58% 82 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 78.1
Splatting 44.5
50% 62.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MyDigitalSSD BPX NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$148
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM04.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 933 561 1075 1081 1015 651 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 877
Write 1,059
Mixed 598
SusWrite 886
193% 855 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 37.9
156% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 895
DQ Write 690
DQ Mixed 614
508% 733 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 172%
Great: 207%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
837GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 114
Write 111
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 104
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 82%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
374GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 150 150 151 150 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 134
Mixed 99.6
SusWrite 149
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 97%
Great: 108%
SABRENT 240GB
36GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 292 295 298 297 297 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 350
Write 295
Mixed 263
SusWrite 294
400% 300 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 26.8
2,976% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26.2
DQ Write 75.7
DQ Mixed 32.5
3,777% 44.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 299%
Great: 293%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$44
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2197 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 25.9
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 25.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $891
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback