Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION  (all builds)
Memory59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 13:02
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3970X-$250
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 96.5
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
82% 141 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 692
71% 571 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 256GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B2S7JA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 252 240 238 245 240 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 2,248
Write 1,200
Mixed 508
SusWrite 255
230% 1,053 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 77.4
234% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 768
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 344
308% 479 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 204%
Great: 277%
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 256GB
92GB free
Firmware: UXM6501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 789 797 779 767 788 770 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 972
Write 758
Mixed 496
SusWrite 782
168% 752 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 46.4
164% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 485
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 216
200% 316 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 154%
Great: 160%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$182
706GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 116 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 130
Write 112
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 115
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2133 C9 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 51.3
MC Write 49.7
MC Mixed 45.9
140% 49 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 124%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION Builds (Compare 683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $577
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback