Asrock N68-S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock N68-S  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090309
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 03:42
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 7750
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Memory 52.9
1-Core 40
2-Core 34.3
31% 42.4 Pts
4-Core 27.8
8-Core 30.3
4% 29 Pts
64-Core 36.1
2% 36.1 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a
ASRock(1849 03D6) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JF10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 15 15 16 26 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 45.3
Write 50.3
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 21.4
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 42%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB-$30
5GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 82 83 82 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 54.5
Write 55
Mixed 35
SusWrite 80.1
41% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 54%
Generic Mass-Storage 32GB
9GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 3.4 4.5 4 3.7 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Read 15.8
Write 8.5
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 4.1
10% 8.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 2
97% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 19%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD032 320GB
149GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 21 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 21.5
Write 22.8
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 20.9
28% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 4.2
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-S Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback