Apple MacBookPro13,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookPro13,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-473D31EABEB93F9B
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 03:11
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6660U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 69
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 170
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 261
34% 258 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 540
Apple(106B 0150) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.67% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 36.8
Parallax 12.9
10% 20.4 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 12
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.67%
Great: 9%
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 2774) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Lighting 41.7
Reflection 39
Parallax 53.5
34% 44.7 fps
MRender 53.1
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 40.8
39% 48.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0512 500GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 947
Write 1,456
Mixed 1357
283% 1,253 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 21.8
62% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 876
DQ Write 659
DQ Mixed 690
537% 742 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4D5435324C31473332443450472D31303720 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 48.6
MC Mixed 20.5
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro13,1 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro13,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback