Asrock N68-S3 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive9.12% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-S3 FX  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 20:55
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 19
2-Core 34.2
31% 40.1 Pts
4-Core 61.6
8-Core 98.8
10% 80.2 Pts
64-Core 91.8
6% 91.8 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 39%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
AMD(1002 67EF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 30
16% 25.9 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 24
Splatting 20
19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kuzuk-24 0GB 240GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 38 49 2.9 3.2 6.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
9.12% Terrible
Read 87.6
Write 2
Mixed 6
SusWrite 16.9
6% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 3.8
15% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.12%
Great: 25%
Seagate ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB
622GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 129 173 174 176 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 174
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 164
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/8G 12GB
333, 333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21.8% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-S3 FX Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-S3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $101
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback