Extracomputer exone-PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemExtracomputer exone-PC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK SABERTOOTH Z77
Memory18.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 20:26
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 195
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 423
46% 362 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Lighting 28.4
Reflection 36.9
Parallax 32.6
23% 32.6 fps
MRender 34.1
Gravity 30.4
Splatting 25.6
24% 30 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 191 192 193 180 149 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.3% Good
Read 243
Write 196
Mixed 202
SusWrite 183
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 29.9
102% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 189
138% 180 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 95%
Intel 330 Series 180GB
62GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 149 134 137 150 141 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.9% Above average
Read 225
Write 180
Mixed 184
SusWrite 144
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 26.2
95% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 170
130% 176 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF 99U5403-160.A00LF 9905403-518.A00LF 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical exone-PC Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Extracomputer exone-PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $312
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback