Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$112 52,721 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	65% Good	Memory 69.8 1-Core 97.9 2-Core 179 66% 116 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 571 54% 448 Pts	64-Core 745 46% 745 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.2% Poor	Lighting 34 Reflection 37.3 Parallax 38.8 28% 36.7 fps	MRender 36.4 Gravity 36.7 Splatting 25.8 26% 33 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-240 240GB 1,980 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0424A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 106 36 8.4 42 4.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 447 Write 384 Mixed 9.5 SusWrite 63.2 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.3 30% 7.73 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB 31,969 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	27.3% Poor	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 10.3 27% 9.53 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 3 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

RAM
BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE 1x8GBCrucialBench 46%, 2,547 samples	20x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBTeamBench 73%, 9,275 samples	15x
2x4GBAdataBench 60%, 13,050 samples	15x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $308

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16