Atcomputers COMFOR OFFICE I100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAtcomputers COMFOR OFFICE I100  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H81M-S2V
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 10:27
Run Duration495 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 158
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 266
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3530) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.95%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 26 22 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.57% Terrible
Read 6
Write 13.5
Mixed 16
SusWrite 23.8
11% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 8.57%
Great: 54%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 1TB
738GB free, PID 2000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 33
Write 32.2
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 33.9
44% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1333 0215 VS2GB1333D4 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical COMFOR OFFICE I100 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Atcomputers COMFOR OFFICE I100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback