Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JAU_X512JA

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JAU_X512JA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512JAU
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210226
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '22 at 09:56
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%
CPU Throttled	86%

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Memory 80 1-Core 128 2-Core 247 84% 152 Pts	4-Core 425 8-Core 554 62% 489 Pts	64-Core 554 34% 554 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7 52,498 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 1052) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 16.9 Reflection 8.7 Parallax 16.3 14% 14 fps	MRender 14 Gravity 16.7 Splatting 21.6 15% 17.4 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB 2,488 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 217 219 217 219 219 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	178% Outstanding	Read 1,346 Write 913 Mixed 1,010 SusWrite 238 195% 877 MB/s	4K Read 51.8 4K Write 185 4K Mixed 62.3 256% 99.8 MB/s	DQ Read 679 DQ Write 746 DQ Mixed 569 468% 665 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 178% Great: 171%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 931GB free Firmware: JU0C2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 133 133 134 133 134 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 141 Write 133 Mixed 54.4 SusWrite 133 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 0.6 245% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB 575 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2667, 3200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 21 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 27.9 SC Mixed 22.2 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JAU_X512JA Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JAU_X512JA

CPU
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	101x

GPU
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	101x

SSD
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBNvmeBench 117%, 2,488 samples	54x
WDC PC SN530 SDB 256GBNvmeBench 147%, 1,127 samples	5x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	4x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GBMicronBench 68%, 575 samples	56x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 04CB 20GBMicronBench 52%, 73 samples	7x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 20GBMicronBench 49%, 25 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16