Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 09:24
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 189
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 600
60% 476 Pts
64-Core 591
40% 591 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 2460 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
47.9% Average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 63.9
51% 65.5 fps
MRender 53
Gravity 56
Splatting 54.1
45% 54.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 46%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$65
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1987 817 814 818 818 819 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,471
Write 2,104
Mixed 1,756
SusWrite 1,012
410% 1,836 MB/s
4K Read 56.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 56.4
218% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 642
DQ Mixed 803
591% 780 MB/s
Poor: 208%
This bench: 261%
Great: 342%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 995GB
693GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 76 76 76 80 241 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 459
Write 71
Mixed 124
SusWrite 133
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 41.2
122% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 217
171% 236 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 132%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 3000 C18 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 27
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 23.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D2C C24F390
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 13,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $295Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $184Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $250Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback