Lenovo 20H6S0DF00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20H6S0DF00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20H6S0DF00
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 07:30
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 173
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 259
33% 251 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 505C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4727
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.76% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 6.3
5% 8.87 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.3
7% 7.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.76%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTE128HMGR-000H1 128GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT22H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 122 128 130 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 339
Write 129
Mixed 133
SusWrite 127
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 13.9
59% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 59.7
90% 176 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 75%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
295GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 108
Mixed 60.1
64% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.1% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 19.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20H6S0DF00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20H6S0DF00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback