Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 480 16,023 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Memory 6.54 1-Core 65.6 2-Core 114 30% 62.1 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 147 20% 152 Pts	64-Core 157 10% 157 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1542) 3.8GB Driver: Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 0.2 Reflection 0.7 0% 0.45 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LS 600 512G 512GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 415GB free (System drive) Firmware: 902XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 102 116 164 172 181 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.2% Below average	Read 197 Write 175 Mixed 141 SusWrite 152 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 29.4 4K Mixed 9 46% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 61.1 63% 102 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ZFNB4G1600LSEC 2x4GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.97% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.5 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 3.4 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 437 9% 437 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 9.97% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	13x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	10x
GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples	4x

SSD
MZ7TY256HDHP-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 398 samples	3x
600 512G 512GBLSBench 60%, 7 samples	2x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	1x

RAM
EBJ20UF8BCS0-DJ-F Transcend JM1333KSN-2G 4GBUnknownBench 18%, 5 samples	2x
ZFNB4G1600LSEC 2x4GBUnknownBench 22%, 2 samples	2x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16