Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 01:12
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600K-$125
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 271
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 853
84% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,083
67% 1,083 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Asus(1043 8739) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 162
Parallax 168
130% 163 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 141
Splatting 117
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 121%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 188 56 44 50 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 726
Write 604
Mixed 577
SusWrite 72.2
110% 495 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 57.8
195% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 81.1
DQ Mixed 80.7
94% 169 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 104%
Great: 242%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
242GB free
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 174 231 245 85 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 499
Write 442
Mixed 407
SusWrite 177
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 22.4
115% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 0.9
66% 154 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75%
Great: 92%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
363GB free
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 176 232 170 85 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 500
Write 445
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 168
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 0.7
56% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 34.5
59% 116 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 92%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 103 101 102 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 96.5
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 104
118% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
163% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 64%
Intenso Ultra Line 64GB
32GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 22.2
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 24
35% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
64% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GTZRX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85% Excellent
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 25
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 26.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 56
71% 56 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85%
Great: 200%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 4,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $469
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback