TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Zotac MEK Mini

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemZotac MEK Mini  (all builds)
MotherboardZOTAC MEK Mini
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190808
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJan 14 '22 at 21:37
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 139
2-Core 278
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 1,093
97% 821 Pts
64-Core 1,021
63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 96.9%
 Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Zotac(19DA 4509)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 150
Parallax 145
124% 149 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 125
Splatting 111
110% 138 fps
Poor: 105% ↑
This bench: 115%
 Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 256GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 0.6 229 265 135 4.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 801
Write 716
Mixed 391
SusWrite 134
113% 511 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 38.6
158% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 572
DQ Mixed 432
380% 571 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 116%
 Great: 214%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
91GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 731 518 379 181 503 508 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,300
Write 1,097
Mixed 1,043
SusWrite 470
219% 977 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 67.6
220% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1063
DQ Write 683
DQ Mixed 435
442% 727 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑
This bench: 188%
 Great: 311%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 126 124 129 129 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 73.5
Write 118
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 124
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 56.8%
 Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS8266.C8FE 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 22.7
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 22.6
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 78.2%
 Great: 81%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MEK Mini Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

System: Zotac MEK Mini

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel  $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples6x
Core i7-8700Intel  $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples5x
Core i7-9700Intel  $243Bench 92%, 79,875 samples4x
GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples5x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples4x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia  $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples4x
SSD
SSD 256GBPcieBench 152%, 15,792 samples4x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung  $170Bench 322%, 93,447 samples2x
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples2x
RAM
CT8G4SFS8266.C8FE 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 16GBUnknownBench 77%, 18 samples3x
ON48G26S819-ZHA 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 24 samples3x
251-10301-3700F 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 13 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback