bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory21.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 752 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 14 '22 at 13:03
Run Duration812 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
CPU socket #0, 4 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 57.5
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 146
52% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 582
51% 434 Pts
64-Core 966
60% 966 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 67%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 64GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 467
Write 316
Mixed 418
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 19.5
79% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 133
104% 145 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 79%
Vmware Virtual disk 140GB
36GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 279 164 333 345 340 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 465
Write 369
Mixed 418
SusWrite 297
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 19.7
79% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 135
105% 147 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 47.7
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 39.9
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 101%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback