Metabox Alpha-X NH70RHQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMetabox Alpha-X NH70RHQ  (all builds)
MotherboardIT NH50_70RH
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '22 at 11:54
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 94.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 252
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 752
73% 598 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Clevo(1558 8552) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9729
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 35.9
Reflection 39.5
Parallax 38.6
29% 38 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 26.1
25% 31 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 849 867 553 53 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,434
Write 891
Mixed 837
SusWrite 400
198% 890 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 68.6
246% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 798
DQ Mixed 341
324% 491 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 183%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 22.3
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 25.3
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Alpha-X NH70RHQ Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Metabox Alpha-X NH70RHQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback