Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW_GX502GW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus Zephyrus S GX502GW_GX502GW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GX502GW
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 14 '22 at 11:36
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 81.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 231
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 671
70% 563 Pts
64-Core 876
54% 876 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Asus(1043 1891) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9709
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.3% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 94.8
Parallax 103
89% 102 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 84.7
Splatting 77
80% 102 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
814GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1318 1353 1335 1378 1270 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,485
Write 1,370
Mixed 1,032
SusWrite 1,126
282% 1,253 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 66.4
226% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 640
DQ Write 695
DQ Mixed 270
313% 535 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 228%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43AB1-CTD Kingston 9905712-035.A00G 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 23.5
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Zephyrus S GX502GW_GX502GW Builds (Compare 283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

System: Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW_GX502GW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback