bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DX79TO
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '22 at 10:57
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 192
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 486
51% 409 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400
Nvidia(10DE 11BE) 2GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.25% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 9.5
9% 11.2 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 12.5
9% 11 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 82 71 71 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 118
Write 105
Mixed 110
SusWrite 74.3
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 21.1
79% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 87.2
DQ Mixed 62.1
58% 91.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
268GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 101 101 102 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 56
Write 97.1
Mixed 52.6
SusWrite 102
56% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 70%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
283GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 103 105 104 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 114
Write 107
Mixed 102
SusWrite 103
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
183% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393955353437312D3032302E4130304C46 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 30.8
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback