Toshiba Satellite Pro L630

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite Pro L630  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '22 at 07:07
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 55.3
2-Core 100
45% 73.1 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 135
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500
Toshiba(1179 FD92) 512MB
Driver: atidxx32 Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.75% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 1.7
0% 1.8 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.75%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
105GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 96 91 167 170 162 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.2% Below average
Read 213
Write 180
Mixed 140
SusWrite 137
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 21.8
4K Mixed 4.9
35% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 69
67% 104 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 78%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB3OC64G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 15 35 58 56 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 60.3
Write 61.7
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 42.7
36% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TSB1066D3S7DR8/2G 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
24% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.5
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.5
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite Pro L630 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite Pro L630

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback