IBM 69Y4438

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIBM 69Y4438  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 18:33
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660
Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 61
2-Core 130
57% 92 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 452
44% 362 Pts
64-Core 858
53% 858 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 74%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5014 239GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 33 34 34 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.3% Very good
Read 229
Write 43.4
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 34
67% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 4.1
1,774% 12.3 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 18 slots used
32GB DIMM
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.4
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 69Y4438 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: IBM 69Y4438

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback