Gigabyte GA-G5 MD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G5 MD  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 09:59
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 68.9
1-Core 158
2-Core 310
94% 179 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 903
93% 750 Pts
64-Core 1,109
69% 1,109 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics i gfx-driver-ci-master-9938 DCH-I
Clevo(1558 5015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.9999
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 51.9
Parallax 6
4% 21 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 7
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 512GB
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1812 2023 1101 738 721 740 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,869
Write 1,962
Mixed 1,832
SusWrite 1,189
386% 1,713 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 65.4
211% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,440
DQ Write 986
DQ Mixed 1,167
884% 1,198 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 267%
Great: 387%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P32NC8W1-BDAS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 23.4
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 18.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G5 MD Builds (Compare 821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G5 MD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback