HP 500-536d

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHP 500-536d  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B2C
Memory2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 08:40
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 273
37% 274 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 2B2C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4889
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.79% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 4.5
3% 3.2 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.79%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AGI512G17AI178 512GB
453GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 371 90 13 284 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 469
Write 392
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 147
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 0.6
36% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 14
DQ Mixed 0.6
20% 53.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.5% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.4
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 9.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-536d Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-536d

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback