HP ZBook 17 G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ZBook 17 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8270
Memory44.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 04:12
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 209
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 549
61% 482 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P3000
HP(103C 8270) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7208
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.8% Average
Lighting 49.5
Reflection 48.2
Parallax 45.4
40% 47.7 fps
MRender 57.9
Gravity 45.6
Splatting 50
42% 51.2 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 563 317 311 324 318 305 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,714
Write 1488
Mixed 612
SusWrite 356
231% 1,043 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 40.9
185% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,000
DQ Write 675
DQ Mixed 611
517% 762 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 183%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G1B1 - [0xBA01] M4S08S681JGGG39-12 Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.6% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 19.9
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 21.3
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 17 G4 Builds (Compare 580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback