Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	16.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191125
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '22 at 22:23
Run Duration	1207 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 928.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Memory 69.3 1-Core 147 2-Core 292 90% 169 Pts	4-Core 560 8-Core 1,152 100% 856 Pts	64-Core 720 45% 720 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000D 1,102 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Nvidia(10DE 096F) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.79 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	6.58% Terrible	Lighting 8.3 Reflection 5.8 Parallax 4.7 7% 6.27 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 11 Splatting 9.5 6% 7.17 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.58% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 1TB 11,818 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 792GB free (System drive) Firmware: STNSC014 SusWrite @10s intervals: 516 896 554 6.8 0 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 1,123 Write 1,223 Mixed 61.3 SusWrite 340 152% 687 MB/s	4K Read 47.2 4K Mixed 50.9 205% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 177% Great: 492%
Ts1tssd3 70S 1TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 804GB free Firmware: O091 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 94 61 1.2 0 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	43.3% Average	Read 171 Write 411 Mixed 309 SusWrite 40.8 53% 233 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 30.5 88% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 66.1 DQ Mixed 1.1 36% 90 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 112%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB 243 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 458 Write 414 95% 436 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 35.9 4K Mixed 36.3 104% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 156 125% 176 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 115%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB 243 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 17TB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Write 77 Mixed 58.2 16% 67.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 10.6 4K Mixed 0.3 13% 5.27 MB/s	DQ Read 4.5 DQ Write 5.9 DQ Mixed 6.1 4% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 115%
WD WD120EMAZ-11BLFA0 12TB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 313GB free Firmware: 81.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 65 44 0.8 0 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	24.5% Poor	Read 60.9 Write 94.1 Mixed 1.5 SusWrite 23.3 32% 45 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.5 176% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 114%
WD WD10 0EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 74GB free Firmware: 83.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 53 36 0.9 0 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Write 8.9 Mixed 0.2 SusWrite 19.7 7% 9.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 9.8 4K Mixed 0.8 291% 3.7 MB/s	DQ Read 0.2 DQ Write 11.9 DQ Mixed 1.5 27% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 106%
WD WD10 0EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 71GB free Firmware: 83.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 60 39 1.2 0 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 90 Write 83.6 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 23.5 46% 62 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1 256% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 106%
WD WD120EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB 507 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1.5TB free Firmware: 81.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 54 36 1.2 0 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 42.4 Write 124 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 22.4 47% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 3 698% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 115%
WD WD120EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB 507 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2TB free Firmware: 81.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 58 41 1.2 0 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 115%
WD WD120EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB 507 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1.5TB free Firmware: 81.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 51 38 1.4 0 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 57.6 Write 118 Mixed 48.1 SusWrite 22.4 45% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 12% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 115%
WD WD120EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB 507 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1.5TB free Firmware: 81.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 71 47 1.2 0 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 7 Write 59.1 SusWrite 28.8 23% 31.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.7 174% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 115%
WD WD120EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB 507 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1.5TB free Firmware: 81.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 46.2 Write 166 Mixed 1.6 51% 71.2 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 9 4K Mixed 1.1 289% 3.37 MB/s	DQ Read 1.4 DQ Write 8.9 DQ Mixed 4.3 42% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 115%
WD WD140EDFZ-11A0VA 14TB 528 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3TB free Firmware: 0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 60 44 1.5 0 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1 Write 50.6 SusWrite 24.9 18% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 1 496% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 116%
WD WD140EDFZ-11A0VA 14TB 528 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3TB free Firmware: 0A81 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 144 Write 133 Mixed 117 99% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Mixed 0 112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 116%
Seagate ST14000NE0008-2JK101 14TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 3TB free Firmware: EN02 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Mixed 208 174% 208 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0 1,516% 13 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 83%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB 3,390 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 20GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 45 34 1 0 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Read 23.6 Write 110 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 19.5 58% 39.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 9.9 4K Mixed 0.7 362% 3.67 MB/s	DQ Read 0.3 DQ Write 9.9 DQ Mixed 1 372% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 2,128 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.1% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 26.9 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 24.7 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	507x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	488x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	362x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	242x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	189x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	162x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	112x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	102x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	70x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	100x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	74x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $691

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16