Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell XPS 8700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KWVT8
Memory17.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140313
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateSep 09 '17 at 21:37
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 184
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 497
52% 415 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Asus(1043 0432) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 42.8
29% 36.7 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 36
26% 31.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 185
Mixed 169
138% 184 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.15
83% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB
993GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 39.9
Write 39.5
Mixed 37.1
50% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.24
82% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21%
Great: 22%
Seagate FreeAgent XTreme 1.5TB
124GB free, PID 3101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 40.3
Write 41.6
Mixed 16.2
40% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19%
Great: 20%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB
60GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 40.8
Write 42.3
Mixed 10.1
37% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.27
52% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 5,118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback