Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '22 at 17:17
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 64.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 279
86% 162 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 842
84% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,078
67% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Gigabyte(1458 3FFB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49.5% Average
Lighting 60.9
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
50% 60.3 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 999GB
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1370 980 969 1052 981 1069 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 2,168
Write 2,687
Mixed 1951
SusWrite 1,070
443% 1,969 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 43.1
214% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 445
DQ Write 1,039
DQ Mixed 205
310% 563 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 248%
Great: 411%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
26GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 130 129 130 130 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 372
Write 360
Mixed 296
SusWrite 160
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 46.9
163% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 116
105% 158 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 108%
Amd-raid ST1000DM010-2EP1 1TB
396GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 171 146 167 166 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 179
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 164
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 114%
Amd-raid ST3000DM007-1WY1 3TB
891GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 106 121 120 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 84.2
Write 103
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 121
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C13 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.2% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 21.5
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 21.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2 Builds (Compare 2,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback