Lenovo 20FXS0SQ05

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20FXS0SQ05  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FXS0SQ05
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '22 at 15:07
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 199
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 533
52% 427 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Legend(17AA 5050) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
8.81% Terrible
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 11.8
11% 12.1 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 0.2
5% 6.67 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.81%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TB8U512G1001 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4133101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 240 242 241 241 240 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 409
Write 423
Mixed 257
SusWrite 254
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 26.7
105% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 228
189% 273 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB M471A2K43BB1-CPB 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 24
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 24.2
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20FXS0SQ05 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20FXS0SQ05

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback