Asus M32CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus M32CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 17:50
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 197
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 384
49% 369 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
MSI(1462 3080) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.8% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 91.2
54% 76.1 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 43.9
45% 56.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 55%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Emtec X150 480GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 152 224 234 169 221 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 464
Write 411
Mixed 313
SusWrite 194
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 20.3
113% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 32.3
66% 134 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 Kingston ASU16D3LU1MNG/4G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 17.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD Builds (Compare 293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback