Lenovo 10AHA0JQFR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10AHA0JQFR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141022
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 14:19
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 175
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 263
35% 261 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
6.42% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 9.4
6% 9.3 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 8.5
7% 9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.42%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 99 50 46 70 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 363
Write 83.1
Mixed 216
SusWrite 61.3
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 17.3
29% 9.87 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 121
94% 128 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264AZ-1G9P1 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.7% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 12.2
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10AHA0JQFR Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

System: Lenovo 10AHA0JQFR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $673
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback