HP Capirona

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Capirona  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2A97
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100430
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 12:09
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 260
Socket S1G2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 26.7
2-Core 51.1
31% 44.7 Pts
4-Core 52.9
8-Core 51.7
7% 52.3 Pts
64-Core 53.2
3% 53.2 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200
HP(103C 2A97) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
0.4% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.53 fps
MRender 0.7
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.4%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 57 78 80 76 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 79.8
Write 84.4
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 77.9
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 5 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.5 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Capirona Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP Capirona

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback