Biostar NF61S-M2A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar NF61S-M2A  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 08:14
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+
Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 31.6
2-Core 61.1
38% 54.3 Pts
4-Core 62.7
8-Core 63.8
8% 63.2 Pts
64-Core 63.9
4% 63.9 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Nvidia(10DE 0523) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.73% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 2
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.1 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.73%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 650 120GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 36 30 86 104 95 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31% Below average
Read 96.5
Write 25.4
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 70.1
15% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 18.7
69% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 52.6
DQ Mixed 28.3
24% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31%
Great: 82%
Excelsto r Technology 80GB
21GB free
Firmware: P21O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 51 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 62.7
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 52.9
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 38%
Netac OnlyDisk 64GB
53GB free, PID 2300, Netac 64GB USB 2.0
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 13.7
Mixed 8.5
11% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NF61S-M2A Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Biostar NF61S-M2A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback