HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8216
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '22 at 18:45
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 75
1-Core 102
2-Core 176
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 275
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 8216) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.32% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 11
Parallax 7.7
7% 9 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.32%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000H1 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT21H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 126 130 177 123 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 397
Write 383
Mixed 300
SusWrite 136
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 43.4
150% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 298
239% 335 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P24HC8T1-BQXS Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.2% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 11.3
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 8,887 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback