HP EliteBook 735 G6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 735 G6  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8589
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211119
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '22 at 18:39
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U w/ Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 150
54% 94.9 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 299
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 6 Graphics
HP(103C 8589) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.45.34.01
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 752 542 305 310 311 310 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 998
Write 767
Mixed 760
SusWrite 422
165% 737 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 56.3
166% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 798
DQ Write 512
DQ Mixed 633
478% 648 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 147%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x] 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 28.5
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 22.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 82%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 735 G6 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 735 G6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback