Acer Veriton M275

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton M275  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M275
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100612
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 10 '22 at 18:01
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5700-$22
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 46
2-Core 78.5
42% 64.1 Pts
4-Core 70.5
8-Core 82.1
10% 76.3 Pts
64-Core 76.4
5% 76.4 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7800 GTX
XFX(1682 2180) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 306.23
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.4
2% 1.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.24%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 150 120GB-$89
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 175 126 156 179 178 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.2% Average
Read 183
Write 189
Mixed 159
SusWrite 159
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 22.6
75% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 99
DQ Mixed 35.3
35% 53.1 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 100%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
565GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 80 83 88 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 82.3
Mixed 52
SusWrite 84.8
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 79%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
17GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.37% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 4
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 2.5
4% 3.62 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 1.37%
Great: 28%
Clikfree Backup Drive 750GB
593GB free, PID 2828
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 22 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 24.8
Write 22.3
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 22.7
30% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 3.3
8% 2.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M275 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $110
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback