Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3010 352 User benchmarks, average bench 24% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.05 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Memory 33.8 1-Core 21 2-Core 41.6 21% 32.1 Pts	4-Core 40.4 8-Core 41.6 5% 41 Pts	64-Core 40.3 2% 40.3 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1297 2053) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.44% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1 Parallax 2.5 1% 1.7 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.44% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 63 68 66 48 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 477 Write 392 Mixed 380 SusWrite 88.8 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 22.6 92% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 86.4 DQ Mixed 47.6 50% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR3 1600 8G 1x8GB 163 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 5.6 19% 6.67 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 233 17% 233 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3010IntelBench 24%, 352 samples	33x
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	6x
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	4x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	43x

RAM
MS3512NSZ-CA3G1 1x4GBUnknownBench 21%, 530 samples	8x
AEDS1600W4G11-BNAD 1x4GBAdataBench 16%, 62 samples	5x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	3x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16