Asus TP203NAH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TP203NAH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP203NAH
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '22 at 16:36
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 45
1-Core 45.8
2-Core 89.2
36% 60 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 175
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505
Asus(1043 1930) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
2.6% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 3.2
2% 2.5 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.6%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0P4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 76 71 72 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 80.1
Write 79.6
Mixed 29
SusWrite 73.5
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 60%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
0GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 87.4
Write 10.2
Mixed 21.5
36% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.4
100% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 9.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TP203NAH Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TP203NAH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback