Dell Latitude E6540

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude E6540  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0VWNW8
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151201
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJan 10 '22 at 08:53
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 172
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 404
39% 322 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37120GB 240GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 109R10A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 203 208 206 204 214 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 411
Write 215
Mixed 242
SusWrite 192
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 10.2
76% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 16.2
49% 104 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 48%
TOSHIBA MQ01ACF050 500GB
21GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 35 35 34 23 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 32.9
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 28.4
40% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KFG/4G Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 14.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6540 Builds (Compare 2,306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6540

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback