HP Pavilion Laptop 14-ec0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 14-ec0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88F2
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210414
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 09 '22 at 18:32
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 75
1-Core 147
2-Core 284
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 804
79% 648 Pts
64-Core 987
61% 987 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX450
HP(103C 88F2) 2GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.50.02.04
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.6% Poor
Lighting 37
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 39.7
30% 34 fps
MRender 18.5
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 32.9
26% 30.7 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1377 1510 1024 694 708 706 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,847
Write 1,504
Mixed 1,261
SusWrite 1,003
314% 1,404 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 70
238% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 753
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 667
458% 576 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 233%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 13.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 17.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Laptop 14-ec0xxx Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 14-ec0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback