To NITX-BD1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardTo NITX-BD1  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 09 '17 at 03:54
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5650U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 163
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 247
33% 245 Pts
64-Core 235
15% 235 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile)
Intel(8086 1626) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
7.02% Terrible
Lighting 8.13
Reflection 8
Parallax 11.8
7% 9.33 fps
MRender 6.67
Gravity 8.53
Splatting 12.1
8% 9.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT128G1122 128GB
107GB free
Firmware: Z2320000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 447
Write 172
Mixed 252
64% 291 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 3.42
71% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 3.39
42% 96.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66% Good
Read 127
Write 102
Mixed 60.1
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.16
107% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 66%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8A-PB 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.4% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback