ADD TO PC
BUILD

LG P210-GE1WK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	LG P210-GE1WK (all builds)
Motherboard	LG PLUTO
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110323
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '22 at 01:40
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium U5600 30 User benchmarks, average bench 29% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Memory 42 1-Core 32.3 2-Core 63.7 28% 46 Pts	4-Core 65.5 8-Core 64.5 9% 65 Pts	64-Core 63.9 4% 63.9 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1854 0153) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 0.7 Reflection 0.3 1% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N610 SSD 1TB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 924GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0427D SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 154 194 178 185 196 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.6% Average	Read 202 Write 196 Mixed 189 SusWrite 181 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 24.1 4K Mixed 21.9 65% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 146 105% 134 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 125%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 2GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 0723 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.1 3.2 3 3 3.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	3.08% Terrible	Read 12.5 Write 2.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 3.1 6% 5.62 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.08% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB 18,713 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.8 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 193 21% 193 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback