| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
| Motherboard | Intel E5 M2L-8D (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20190618 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 08 '22 at 15:22 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
48.3%
Average
|
45% 78.3 Pts
|
43% 368 Pts
|
76% 1,228 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.30
|
30.9%
Below average
|
31% 43.1 fps
|
31% 38.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk X400 256GB-$29
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 183 181 183 182 182 MB/s
|
76.8%
Very good
|
66% 300 MB/s
|
113% 43 MB/s
|
167% 252 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1 1x8GB
1 of 16 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
26.8%
Poor
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
11% 3.93 GB/s
|
26% 157 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical E5 M2L-8D Builds (Compare 75 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel E5 M2L-8D
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2689 01stBench 66%, 461 samples | 12x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 9x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX Vega-56AMD $170Bench 78%, 92,053 samples | 8x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 7x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 109% - Outstanding | Total price: $170 |