MSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B61
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61)  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170904
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateJan 08 '22 at 08:51
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 58.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 198
67% 123 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 410
53% 401 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 42.1
Reflection 40
Parallax 37.8
34% 40 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 26.8
28% 35 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 128 122 119 117 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,492
Write 927
Mixed 427
SusWrite 163
165% 752 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 54.2
183% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,114
DQ Write 664
DQ Mixed 756
599% 844 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 166%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
915GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 144 145 145 145 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 119
Write 68
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 144
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
236GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 89 89 90 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 86.8
Write 67.2
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 88.8
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 101%
ASMT 2105 500GB
319GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 74 77 76 77 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 92.2
Write 23.3
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 76.3
82% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.3
217% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 859B BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 20.7
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61) Builds (Compare 7,346 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61) - $125

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback