Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Huanan Default string (all builds)
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-8MD3
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20200525
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '22 at 07:53
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2676 v3 167 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 88 1-Core 85.4 2-Core 164 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 608 54% 457 Pts	64-Core 1,246 77% 1,246 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800 6,394 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB Ram: 768MB, Driver: 337.88 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.19% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 9 Parallax 1.7 4% 5.37 fps	MRender 6.7 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 3.3 4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.19% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP S600 240G 240GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 412 414 413 341 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	79.9% Very good	Read 459 Write 405 Mixed 367 SusWrite 336 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 17.1 107% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 29.4 78% 158 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866D3/8G DDR3 1x8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 16 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 2000 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 9.8 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 13.2 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 35%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

RAM
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	28x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	25x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	23x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $130

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16