Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 08 '22 at 00:08
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 244
90% 158 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 731
72% 590 Pts
64-Core 713
44% 713 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2027 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78% Very good
Lighting 96.5
Reflection 109
Parallax 96.8
79% 101 fps
MRender 91.1
Gravity 93
Splatting 96.3
77% 93.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 922 861 864 859 854 845 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,536
Write 2,327
Mixed 1,493
SusWrite 868
403% 1,806 MB/s
4K Read 69.2
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 98.4
330% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,431
DQ Write 1,092
DQ Mixed 1,242
934% 1,255 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 313%
Great: 355%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
234GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 118 116 118 116 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 136
Write 138
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 115
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
231GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 156 157 153 154 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 170
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 155
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 112%
SAMSUNG HD252KJ 250GB
89GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 20 21 20 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.4% Very poor
Read 42.6
Write 38.6
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 20.5
44% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 18%
KINGSTON SV300S37A240G 240GB
44GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 43.9
Write 38
Mixed 41.8
SusWrite 19.3
47% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 18.6
4K Mixed 14.5
1,170% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 13.4
DQ Write 20.2
DQ Mixed 15.5
1,264% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 192%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
10GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 5.4 6 6.1 6.5 5.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 18.9
Write 7
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 5.7
12% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.6
183% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3600 C17 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3297 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.5
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 21.3
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 52
77% 52 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,075 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $891
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback