Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P8400-$20 6,904 User benchmarks, average bench 37% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Memory 70.3 1-Core 34.9 2-Core 70.1 39% 58.4 Pts	4-Core 70.3 8-Core 69.2 9% 69.8 Pts	64-Core 69 4% 69 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 3,003 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sony(104D 9035) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.66% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 1 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1 Splatting 4.8 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.66% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HM251JI 250GB 908 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2SS00_03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 26 27 26 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.38% Terrible	Read 2.2 Write 32.4 Mixed 6.3 SusWrite 26.9 12% 17 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 78% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.38% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 5.1 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 5.4 13% 4.63 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core2 Duo P8400Intel $20Bench 37%, 6,904 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 3650ATIBench 2%, 3,003 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $20