Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2270
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151028
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '22 at 21:07
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5300U 29,898 User benchmarks, average bench 42% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 79.7 1-Core 88.7 2-Core 150 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 214 29% 217 Pts	64-Core 218 14% 218 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN6S-256G-1006 256GB 4,074 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3511006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 246 241 205 227 253 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 426 Write 338 Mixed 226 SusWrite 238 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 42.8 4K Mixed 23.9 86% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 197 169% 251 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 92%
Specific STORAGE DEVICE 16GB 230 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 8GB free, PID 0918 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.2 5 5.8 6.1 5.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 80.3 Write 7.3 Mixed 18.9 SusWrite 5.8 26% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 37% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AM1L16BC4R1-B1YS Hynix HMT851S6CMR6A-PB 8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	50.2% Above average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 15.6 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 81.1 49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	25x

SSD
MZNTE256HMHP-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 65%, 1,776 samples	6x
IT L8T-256L9G-HP 256GBLiteonBench 81%, 601 samples	4x
L8H-256V2G-HP 256GBLiteonBench 74%, 4,213 samples	4x

RAM
AM1L16BC4R1-B1YS Hynix HMT851S6AMR6R-PB 8GBAdataBench 49%, 347 samples	10x
HMT451B6BFR8A-PB HMT851S6CMR6A-PB 8GBHynixBench 51%, 88 samples	4x
M471B5173QHY-YK0 Hynix HMT851S6AMR6R-PB 8GBSamsungBench 49%, 220 samples	3x