Lenovo 20KS003JMC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20KS003JMC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20KS003JMC
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210429
Uptime7.3 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 23:33
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 113
2-Core 210
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 441
49% 388 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 5069) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9749
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 8.5
6% 11.3 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 0.3
4% 6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GD9TNG-L5B0B 256GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80750C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 177 171 166 162 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 280
Mixed 463
SusWrite 168
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 44.8
159% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 530
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 293
237% 345 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 183%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
281GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 58 57 56 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 70.7
Write 62.3
Mixed 46.9
SusWrite 57.4
44% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 859B CT8G4SFD824AC16FBD1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.5% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 22.3
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 22.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20KS003JMC Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20KS003JMC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback